I'm sence'n this might eventually get moved to I.D. cuz shits about to go down on this one.
So, it seems Bush has found a loophole in the system, to bypass the Senate, to install Bolton as ambassader to the UN.
1. If Bush, basically threw out a 'diplomatic' process, in which troops are die'n for allll over the world for, and took a rather 'dictator' step, what makes the American public confident, he won't step over senate for other laws, and policies (ie. patriot act wasn't read by entire senate)
2. Bolton, has been very conservative his entire life, and he has some rather 'radical views' within his ideogies and ideas. He has especially been very critical towards the UN, and has basically said most, if not all, of UN is useless.
I ask you Bounce, what his is intentions, and why would Bush appoint him?
and second, should we expect to see more loophole finding within the constitution by the president? if so, shall we be fearing the loss of democracy within the US House, and get ready for Marshel Law, or am I just a parinoid conspirotorial thinker?
cuz all fingers point at the US slowley lose'n it's democracy, and going towards a much different way og governing the country.